Skip to page content | Text onlyGraphical version of this page

Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within news.



Main Navigation


 Home  
  Products  
  My Tiscali  
  Living  
  Money  
  Motoring  
  News  
  Play to Win  
  Shop  
  Sport  
  Travel  
  Video  
  Help 

Court rules SFO unlawfully ended Saudi probe

10/04/2008 11:17

LONDON (Reuters) - A court ruled on Thursday that the country’s Serious Fraud Office (SFO) acted unlawfully in ending investigations into allegations of bribery and corruption in arms deals with Saudi Arabia.

Two judges allowed a challenge brought by anti-arms campaigners, the Corner House Research Group and the Campaign Against Arms Trade (CATT), over the case involving Europe’s biggest defence company, BAE Systems.

Then-Prime Minister Tony Blair drew widespread criticism from political opponents and the media after saying that if the SFO had proceeded with its investigation, it would damage national security.

The campaigners had claimed there was "very large scale bribery" of senior Saudi Arabian officials by the arms manufacturer over the massive Al Yamamah military contracts.

They argued that the SFO abandoned its investigation following threats by members of the Saudi Arabian royal family to cancel a proposed order for Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft and to withdraw security and intelligence cooperation.

"To preserve the integrity and independence of the judgment demanded resistance to the pressure exerted by means of a specific threat," one of the judges, Lord Justice Moses, told the High Court in London.

"That threat was intended to prevent the (SFO) director from pursuing the course of investigation .....continued below

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

he had chosen to adopt. It achieved its purpose," Moses said.

"No one, whether within this country or outside, is entitled to interfere with the course of our justice. It is the failure of government and the defendant to bear that essential principle in mind that justifies the intervention of this court," he said.

Asked for the company’s reaction, a BAE spokeswoman said: "The case was between two campaign groups and the director of the SFO. It concerned the legality of a decision made by the director of the SFO. BAE Systems played no part in that decision."

The SFO had no immediate comment and Saudi Arabian envoys in London could not be reached.

(Reporting by Paul Majendie, Avril Ormsby, editing by David Clarke)

LONDON (Reuters) - A court ruled on Thursday that the country’s Serious Fraud Office (SFO) acted unlawfully in ending investigations into allegations of bribery and corruption in arms deals with Saudi Arabia.

Two judges allowed a challenge brought by anti-arms campaigners, the Corner House Research Group and the Campaign Against Arms Trade (CATT), over the case involving Europe’s biggest defence company, BAE Systems.

Then-Prime Minister Tony Blair drew widespread criticism from political opponents and the media after saying that if the SFO had proceeded with its investigation, it would damage national security.

The campaigners had claimed there was "very large scale bribery" of senior Saudi Arabian officials by the arms manufacturer over the massive Al Yamamah military contracts.

They argued that the SFO abandoned its investigation following threats by members of the Saudi Arabian royal family to cancel a proposed order for Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft and to withdraw security and intelligence cooperation.

"To preserve the integrity and independence of the judgment demanded resistance to the pressure exerted by means of a specific threat," one of the judges, Lord Justice Moses, told the High Court in London.

"That threat was intended to prevent the (SFO) director from pursuing the course of investigation he had chosen to adopt. It achieved its purpose," Moses said.

"No one, whether within this country or outside, is entitled to interfere with the course of our justice. It is the failure of government and the defendant to bear that essential principle in mind that justifies the intervention of this court," he said.

Asked for the company’s reaction, a BAE spokeswoman said: "The case was between two campaign groups and the director of the SFO. It concerned the legality of a decision made by the director of the SFO. BAE Systems played no part in that decision."

The SFO had no immediate comment and Saudi Arabian envoys in London could not be reached.

(Reporting by Paul Majendie, Avril Ormsby, editing by David Clarke)




Page: 1 | 2 | 3
Reuters logo
© 2008 Reuters Click for restrictions

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

U.S. Elections

Find out all about American's next President and how the states voted.

Weekly quiz

Have you been paying attention? Take our weekly, fun news quiz to test your knowledge of current affairs.

Weather forecasts

Get the 7-day forecast for your region.

WAGS

It's not just footballers who get shown the red card. Take a look at some of the WAGS back on the market.

Odd pics

Look back at the week in picture in our special gallery of the weird and wonderful.

Experian Credit Report

Check who's been checking on you with your FREE Experian credit report.

London Weather

Rain
min: 2º max:7º
 
 

Page Footer


Access keys


You will need to use different key combinations in order to use access keys depending on your internet browser, find out which on our accessibility page.
  • (0) Navigate to Accessibility page.
  • (1) Navigate to Home page.
  • (2) Navigate to My email.
  • (3) Navigate to My Account.
  • (4) Navigate to Site Map page.
  • (5) Navigate to Contact us page.
  • (6) Navigate to Members channel.
  • (7) Navigate to Services channel.
  • (8) Navigate to News & Info channel.
  • (9) Navigate to Entertainment channel.
  • ([) Skip down to the Primary navigation block.
  • (]) Skip down to the more links within this section block.
  • (=) Bypass all navigation and jump to the content.
  • (x) Text only version of this page.
Background images used:
furniture images used in the site icons used in the site images used in the header