Skip to page content | Text onlyGraphical version of this page

Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within news.



Main Navigation


 Home  
  Products  
  My Tiscali  
  Living  
  Money  
  Motoring  
  News  
  Play to Win  
  Shop  
  Sport  
  Travel  
  Video  
  Help 

EU court "teacake ruling" may boost VAT refunds

10/04/2008 14:26

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Union’s top court ruled on Thursday that EU governments and taxpayers must be treated equally when it comes to reimbursements for wrongly paid sales tax, a move experts said could boost VAT refunds.

The European Court of Justice was ruling on a case brought by retailer Marks & Spencer , which had argued it was entitled to a full refund of wrongly paid value-added tax on sales of its chocolate teacakes.

The court said an EU state can refuse to reimburse wrongly paid VAT on the basis of "unjust enrichment" -- but only if fiscal neutrality and equal treatment are observed.

The sums involved for the company are tiny but the principle could make it easier for people to claim refunds, experts said.

When VAT was introduced in Britain in 1973, the store’s "teacakes" were classified as biscuits and therefore subject to the standard sales tax rate. Cakes are zero rated.

In 1994, Britain’s customs authority admitted the teacakes should not be subject to VAT and the company claimed a 3.5 million pound refund.

Customs paid only 88,440 pounds to the company, saying most of the VAT burden had been passed on to customers and that paying the refund in full would amount to "unjust enrichment".

Britain’s House of Lords will decide whether in light of the .....continued below

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

EU court ruling Marks & Spencer can have a full refund.

The British parliament’s upper chamber would have to grant the refund if it accepts that other retailers in a similar position have already won refunds.

Tax experts said the ruling ended a situation whereby the government could claim unjust enrichment for not refunding wrongly paid VAT but a taxpayer could not.

"The court is setting aside some of the unjust enrichment argument put forward by a member state," said Chas Roy-Chowdhury of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.

"It makes it less of a one-way street and much more of an evenly handed approach to incorrectly applied VAT as before the odds were stacked against the taxpayer," Roy-Chowdhury said.

(Reporting by Huw Jones; Editing by Dale Hudson)

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Union’s top court ruled on Thursday that EU governments and taxpayers must be treated equally when it comes to reimbursements for wrongly paid sales tax, a move experts said could boost VAT refunds.

The European Court of Justice was ruling on a case brought by retailer Marks & Spencer , which had argued it was entitled to a full refund of wrongly paid value-added tax on sales of its chocolate teacakes.

The court said an EU state can refuse to reimburse wrongly paid VAT on the basis of "unjust enrichment" -- but only if fiscal neutrality and equal treatment are observed.

The sums involved for the company are tiny but the principle could make it easier for people to claim refunds, experts said.

When VAT was introduced in Britain in 1973, the store’s "teacakes" were classified as biscuits and therefore subject to the standard sales tax rate. Cakes are zero rated.

In 1994, Britain’s customs authority admitted the teacakes should not be subject to VAT and the company claimed a 3.5 million pound refund.

Customs paid only 88,440 pounds to the company, saying most of the VAT burden had been passed on to customers and that paying the refund in full would amount to "unjust enrichment".

Britain’s House of Lords will decide whether in light of the EU court ruling Marks & Spencer can have a full refund.

The British parliament’s upper chamber would have to grant the refund if it accepts that other retailers in a similar position have already won refunds.

Tax experts said the ruling ended a situation whereby the government could claim unjust enrichment for not refunding wrongly paid VAT but a taxpayer could not.

"The court is setting aside some of the unjust enrichment argument put forward by a member state," said Chas Roy-Chowdhury of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.

"It makes it less of a one-way street and much more of an evenly handed approach to incorrectly applied VAT as before the odds were stacked against the taxpayer," Roy-Chowdhury said.

(Reporting by Huw Jones; Editing by Dale Hudson)




Page: 1 | 2 | 3
Reuters logo
© 2008 Reuters Click for restrictions

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

U.S. Elections

Find out all about American's next President and how the states voted.

Weekly quiz

Have you been paying attention? Take our weekly, fun news quiz to test your knowledge of current affairs.

Weather forecasts

Get the 7-day forecast for your region.

WAGS

It's not just footballers who get shown the red card. Take a look at some of the WAGS back on the market.

Odd pics

Look back at the week in picture in our special gallery of the weird and wonderful.

Experian Credit Report

Check who's been checking on you with your FREE Experian credit report.

London Weather

Cloudy
min: 5º max:8º
 
 

Page Footer


Access keys


You will need to use different key combinations in order to use access keys depending on your internet browser, find out which on our accessibility page.
  • (0) Navigate to Accessibility page.
  • (1) Navigate to Home page.
  • (2) Navigate to My email.
  • (3) Navigate to My Account.
  • (4) Navigate to Site Map page.
  • (5) Navigate to Contact us page.
  • (6) Navigate to Members channel.
  • (7) Navigate to Services channel.
  • (8) Navigate to News & Info channel.
  • (9) Navigate to Entertainment channel.
  • ([) Skip down to the Primary navigation block.
  • (]) Skip down to the more links within this section block.
  • (=) Bypass all navigation and jump to the content.
  • (x) Text only version of this page.
Background images used:
furniture images used in the site icons used in the site images used in the header