Skip to page content | Text onlyGraphical version of this page

Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within news.



Main Navigation


 Home  
  Products  
  My Tiscali  
  Living  
  Money  
  Motoring  
  News  
  Play to Win  
  Shop  
  Sport  
  Travel  
  Video  
  Help 

"Quarterlife" never stood a chance on broadcast TV

03/03/2008 14:39

By Andrew Wallenstein

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Leave it to a program about twentysomethings adrift to bounce around the media ecosystem like a shiftless slacker. And so it was for "quarterlife", which stumbled from the Internet to broadcast TV to cable in the course of a week.

It probably wasn’t quite the arc envisioned by the series’ creator, Marshall Herskovitz. The former "thirtysomething" executive producer has been hailed as a visionary for attempting to make a go of original programming on the Internet; getting NBC to sign on for a second window was just the cherry on top.

But the horrific ratings performance of "quarterlife" on NBC last week, compounded by ill-advised public remarks Herskovitz made expressing his regrets, stained what could have been a success story to remember. To add insult to injury, "quarterlife" has since been consigned to NBC’s sister cable channel Bravo, which Herskovitz has deemed a better fit.

But the irony of the failure of "quarterlife" to make the transition from the Internet to broadcast is that it never should have been on the Internet or broadcast. This was and always has been a cable series.

"Quarterlife" isn’t really all that different from another NBC series struggling for survival: "Friday Night Lights". In both cases, .....continued below

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

NBC has learned the hard way that a drama about young adults -- even, and especially, a quality drama that trades in nuance and subtlety -- is simply too narrow to appeal to the broad audience necessary to grab a decent broadcast rating.

The ugly truth of broadcast TV is that it is impossible to command a significant audience without something that can appeal to the latter half of the 25-54 demographic; they are the generation that still makes TV the foundation of their media consumption habits. So why would anyone well over 25 tune in to a drama about the trials and tribulations of being 25?

Demographically speaking, "quarterlife" is a better fit for the Internet, and yet it doesn’t quite fit on that medium. The problem is tonal; there simply has never been a quality scripted drama that has worked online. The Internet seems more hospitable to comedy and unscripted formats.

Once Herskovitz got back the rights to "quarterlife" from ABC, which originally developed the series, he should have taken the program to a young-skewing cable network that has made scripted programming work before. An edgier version of the series, with amped-up language and sexuality, would have been a great fit for, say, Showtime, which doesn’t have to cater to any particular demo.

But the funny thing is, "quarterlife" may still be on the wrong network. Bravo is the home to 100% unscripted programs that are all about superficial materialism from fashion ("Project Runway") to dating ("The Millionaire Matchmaker"). "Quarterlife" is a scripted drama about navel-gazing twentysomethings searching for their authentic selves. Scheduling "quarterlife" on Bravo is like filling a Humvee with ethanol fuel.

Page: 12next

By Andrew Wallenstein

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Leave it to a program about twentysomethings adrift to bounce around the media ecosystem like a shiftless slacker. And so it was for "quarterlife", which stumbled from the Internet to broadcast TV to cable in the course of a week.

It probably wasn’t quite the arc envisioned by the series’ creator, Marshall Herskovitz. The former "thirtysomething" executive producer has been hailed as a visionary for attempting to make a go of original programming on the Internet; getting NBC to sign on for a second window was just the cherry on top.

But the horrific ratings performance of "quarterlife" on NBC last week, compounded by ill-advised public remarks Herskovitz made expressing his regrets, stained what could have been a success story to remember. To add insult to injury, "quarterlife" has since been consigned to NBC’s sister cable channel Bravo, which Herskovitz has deemed a better fit.

But the irony of the failure of "quarterlife" to make the transition from the Internet to broadcast is that it never should have been on the Internet or broadcast. This was and always has been a cable series.

"Quarterlife" isn’t really all that different from another NBC series struggling for survival: "Friday Night Lights". In both cases, NBC has learned the hard way that a drama about young adults -- even, and especially, a quality drama that trades in nuance and subtlety -- is simply too narrow to appeal to the broad audience necessary to grab a decent broadcast rating.

The ugly truth of broadcast TV is that it is impossible to command a significant audience without something that can appeal to the latter half of the 25-54 demographic; they are the generation that still makes TV the foundation of their media consumption habits. So why would anyone well over 25 tune in to a drama about the trials and tribulations of being 25?

Demographically speaking, "quarterlife" is a better fit for the Internet, and yet it doesn’t quite fit on that medium. The problem is tonal; there simply has never been a quality scripted drama that has worked online. The Internet seems more hospitable to comedy and unscripted formats.

Once Herskovitz got back the rights to "quarterlife" from ABC, which originally developed the series, he should have taken the program to a young-skewing cable network that has made scripted programming work before. An edgier version of the series, with amped-up language and sexuality, would have been a great fit for, say, Showtime, which doesn’t have to cater to any particular demo.

But the funny thing is, "quarterlife" may still be on the wrong network. Bravo is the home to 100% unscripted programs that are all about superficial materialism from fashion ("Project Runway") to dating ("The Millionaire Matchmaker"). "Quarterlife" is a scripted drama about navel-gazing twentysomethings searching for their authentic selves. Scheduling "quarterlife" on Bravo is like filling a Humvee with ethanol fuel.

Here’s a suggestion for NBC Universal: Why not put "quarterlife" on its newly acquired cable network, Oxygen? The network has the same young-female skew as the series, and the addition of "quarterlife" would have been just the injection of buzz-generating original programming that would have signalled that NBC Universal is angling to turn that network around.

Getting 3.1 million viewers is awful on NBC, but that kind of audience on Oxygen would have execs popping Champagne corks. It’s difficult to understand why anyone involved in "quarterlife" didn’t realize that from the very beginning.

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter




Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Reuters logo
© 2008 Reuters Click for restrictions

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

U.S. Elections

Find out all about American's next President and how the states voted.

Weekly quiz

Have you been paying attention? Take our weekly, fun news quiz to test your knowledge of current affairs.

Weather forecasts

Get the 7-day forecast for your region.

WAGS

It's not just footballers who get shown the red card. Take a look at some of the WAGS back on the market.

Odd pics

Look back at the week in picture in our special gallery of the weird and wonderful.

Experian Credit Report

Check who's been checking on you with your FREE Experian credit report.

London Weather

Cloudy
min: 5º max:8º
 
 

Page Footer


Access keys


You will need to use different key combinations in order to use access keys depending on your internet browser, find out which on our accessibility page.
  • (0) Navigate to Accessibility page.
  • (1) Navigate to Home page.
  • (2) Navigate to My email.
  • (3) Navigate to My Account.
  • (4) Navigate to Site Map page.
  • (5) Navigate to Contact us page.
  • (6) Navigate to Members channel.
  • (7) Navigate to Services channel.
  • (8) Navigate to News & Info channel.
  • (9) Navigate to Entertainment channel.
  • ([) Skip down to the Primary navigation block.
  • (]) Skip down to the more links within this section block.
  • (=) Bypass all navigation and jump to the content.
  • (x) Text only version of this page.
Background images used:
furniture images used in the site icons used in the site images used in the header