Skip to page content | Text onlyGraphical version of this page

Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within news.



Main Navigation


 Home  
  Products  
  My Tiscali  
  Living  
  Money  
  Motoring  
  News  
  Play to Win  
  Shop  
  Sport  
  Travel  
  Video  
  Help 

M&S seen due tax refund over teacakes

13/12/2007 15:06

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Marks & Spencer is entitled to a full refund of wrongly paid value-added tax on sales of its chocolate teacakes, an adviser to the European Union’s top court said on Thursday.

When VAT was introduced in 1973, the store’s "teacakes" were classified as biscuits therefore subject to the standard sales tax rate. Cakes are zero rated.

In 1994, Britain’s customs authority admitted the teacakes should not be subject to VAT and the company claimed 3.5 million pounds.

Customs only paid 88,440 pounds to the company, saying that most of the VAT burden had been passed on to customers in any case and that paying the refund in full would amount to "unjust enrichment".

Advocate General Juliane Kokott, an adviser to the European Court of Justice, said the "unjust enrichment" objection cannot be invoked as long as it offended the principle of equal treatment.

The full court backs an advocate general in most cases.

(Reporting by Huw Jones, editing by Paul Boilding)

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Marks & Spencer is entitled to a full refund of wrongly paid value-added tax on sales of its chocolate teacakes, an adviser to the European Union’s top court said on Thursday.

When VAT was introduced in 1973, the store’s "teacakes" were classified as biscuits therefore subject to the standard sales tax rate. Cakes are zero rated.

In 1994, Britain’s customs authority admitted the teacakes should not be subject to VAT and the company claimed 3.5 million pounds.

Customs only paid 88,440 pounds to the company, saying that most of the VAT burden had been passed on to customers in any case and that paying the refund in full would amount to "unjust enrichment".

Advocate General Juliane Kokott, an adviser to the European Court of Justice, said the "unjust enrichment" objection cannot be invoked as long as it offended the principle of equal treatment.

The full court backs an advocate general in most cases.

(Reporting by Huw Jones, editing by Paul Boilding)




Page: 1 | 2
Reuters logo
© 2008 Reuters Click for restrictions

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

U.S. Elections

Find out all about American's next President and how the states voted.

Weekly quiz

Have you been paying attention? Take our weekly, fun news quiz to test your knowledge of current affairs.

Weather forecasts

Get the 7-day forecast for your region.

WAGS

It's not just footballers who get shown the red card. Take a look at some of the WAGS back on the market.

Odd pics

Look back at the week in picture in our special gallery of the weird and wonderful.

Experian Credit Report

Check who's been checking on you with your FREE Experian credit report.

London Weather

Cloudy
min: 4º max:6º
 
 

Page Footer


Access keys


You will need to use different key combinations in order to use access keys depending on your internet browser, find out which on our accessibility page.
  • (0) Navigate to Accessibility page.
  • (1) Navigate to Home page.
  • (2) Navigate to My email.
  • (3) Navigate to My Account.
  • (4) Navigate to Site Map page.
  • (5) Navigate to Contact us page.
  • (6) Navigate to Members channel.
  • (7) Navigate to Services channel.
  • (8) Navigate to News & Info channel.
  • (9) Navigate to Entertainment channel.
  • ([) Skip down to the Primary navigation block.
  • (]) Skip down to the more links within this section block.
  • (=) Bypass all navigation and jump to the content.
  • (x) Text only version of this page.
Background images used:
furniture images used in the site icons used in the site images used in the header