Skip to page content |

Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within news.



Main Navigation


 Home  
  Products  
  My Tiscali  
  Living  
  Money  
  Motoring  
  News  
  Play to Win  
  Shop  
  Sport  
  Travel  
  Video  
  Help 

"Sham marriage" law ruled discriminatory

23/05/2007 14:44

LONDON (Reuters) - A law designed to combat "sham marriages" by forcing immigrants to seek government permission if they want to marry is discriminatory and breaches their human rights, the Appeal Court ruled on Wednesday.

Three top judges backed a High Court ruling that the powers, introduced by former Home Secretary David Blunkett in the Asylum and Immigration Act 2004, went beyond their intended aim and were unlawful.

The scheme -- believed to be the first time any British government has restricted the right of a consenting adult to marry -- meant a person subject to immigration control had to apply to the Home Secretary for approval to marry.

However the law, designed to stop bogus marriages being used to get round immigration restrictions, did not apply to those who married according to the rites of the Church of England.

In the High Court ruling, Justice Silber declared that the legislation was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

That decision was backed by the Court of Appeal which rejected an appeal by the current Home Secretary, John Reid.

"I consider that the judge was right to hold that the scheme fails the test of proportionality," said Lord Justice Buxton.

Amit Sachdev, lawyer for two of the couples involved in the case, said the decision showed "the government’s ongoing .....continued below

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

and abject failure to respect the human rights of immigrants".

"This Act was a knee-jerk reaction based on speculation and conjecture rather than evidence," he said.

"The Court of Appeal went further than Mr Justice Silber last year and found the whole scheme to be completely illegal and not only discriminatory but a breach of a person’s fundamental human right to marry, whatever that person’s immigration status in the United Kingdom."

The power was brought in amid fears that illegal immigrants were exploiting the lax marriage laws.

In 2004, the Home Office said it had smashed a criminal network which operated a scam where participants paid up to 10,000 pounds to partake in a bogus marriage.

A senior registrar said at the time, it was estimated that between 10,000 and 15,000 fake marriages took place in the country every year.

LONDON (Reuters) - A law designed to combat "sham marriages" by forcing immigrants to seek government permission if they want to marry is discriminatory and breaches their human rights, the Appeal Court ruled on Wednesday.

Three top judges backed a High Court ruling that the powers, introduced by former Home Secretary David Blunkett in the Asylum and Immigration Act 2004, went beyond their intended aim and were unlawful.

The scheme -- believed to be the first time any British government has restricted the right of a consenting adult to marry -- meant a person subject to immigration control had to apply to the Home Secretary for approval to marry.

However the law, designed to stop bogus marriages being used to get round immigration restrictions, did not apply to those who married according to the rites of the Church of England.

In the High Court ruling, Justice Silber declared that the legislation was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

That decision was backed by the Court of Appeal which rejected an appeal by the current Home Secretary, John Reid.

"I consider that the judge was right to hold that the scheme fails the test of proportionality," said Lord Justice Buxton.

Amit Sachdev, lawyer for two of the couples involved in the case, said the decision showed "the government’s ongoing and abject failure to respect the human rights of immigrants".

"This Act was a knee-jerk reaction based on speculation and conjecture rather than evidence," he said.

"The Court of Appeal went further than Mr Justice Silber last year and found the whole scheme to be completely illegal and not only discriminatory but a breach of a person’s fundamental human right to marry, whatever that person’s immigration status in the United Kingdom."

The power was brought in amid fears that illegal immigrants were exploiting the lax marriage laws.

In 2004, the Home Office said it had smashed a criminal network which operated a scam where participants paid up to 10,000 pounds to partake in a bogus marriage.

A senior registrar said at the time, it was estimated that between 10,000 and 15,000 fake marriages took place in the country every year.




Page: 1 | 2 | 3
Reuters logo
© 2008 Reuters Click for restrictions

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

Weekly quiz

Have you been paying attention? Take our weekly, fun news quiz to test your knowledge of current affairs.

Weather forecasts

Get the 7-day forecast for your region.

Can you spell?

Can you spell better than an undergraduate? Find out in our spelling test.

WAGS

It's not just footballers who get shown the red card. Take a look at some of the WAGS back on the market.

Odd pics

Look back at the week in picture in our special gallery of the weird and wonderful.

Experian Credit Report

Check who's been checking on you with your FREE Experian credit report.

London Weather

Overcast
min: 13º max:17º
 
 

Page Footer


Access keys


You will need to use different key combinations in order to use access keys depending on your internet browser, find out which on our accessibility page.
  • (0) Navigate to Accessibility page.
  • (1) Navigate to Home page.
  • (2) Navigate to My email.
  • (3) Navigate to My Account.
  • (4) Navigate to Site Map page.
  • (5) Navigate to Contact us page.
  • (6) Navigate to Members channel.
  • (7) Navigate to Services channel.
  • (8) Navigate to News & Info channel.
  • (9) Navigate to Entertainment channel.
  • ([) Skip down to the Primary navigation block.
  • (]) Skip down to the more links within this section block.
  • (=) Bypass all navigation and jump to the content.
Background images used:
furniture images used in the site icons used in the site images used in the header