
Search: Latest house price figures
- Read more Pryor on Property features
- Share your thoughts on the property market
The RiCS has stoked the housing market by spraying petrol onto it providing a prediction that prices may end the year up on where they were in January.
Their monthly report reflects an about turn on their expectations of falls of between 10 and 15% and reports in their survey last month that more surveyors saw prices falling than rising.
In their forecast at Christmas, the RiCS predicted that transaction volumes would pick up in 2009 (they’ve fallen so far) and that the peak to trough price decline would be 25% (it's down 20% so far according to Halifax).
Their change of heart is all the more confusing when one considers that just last week the Nationwide confirmed prices were down year on year (-6.2%)and on the same day that Lloyds announced it’s £4bn loss, their Halifax subsidiary announced a -12% fall and the Land Registry recorded -14%.
Frankly, talk of a rises in confidence from Chartered Surveyors tries to match the expectations of the glorious summer weather we were promised but like the revised forecast from the Met Office, the evidence of an end to the property crash may be something that the forecasters got wrong?
Gap between asking price and sale price widens
But why do I say this? The first thing to consider is the increasing gap between asking prices and sale prices. Since January 2003 this gap has bumped along at around £28k but in the last 12 months it has risen to a yawning £70,000.
Since the homes that sell are a subset of all the homes marketed, this might be explained if more cheaper homes were selling relative to more expensive ones but there is no evidence for this - in fact quite the reverse.
However, of more importance are the tiny volumes of properties coming onto the market verses the number selling every day. What is interesting to note is that the gap between the two is closing but even more dramatic are that volumes of both have plunged.
If there were just one home on the market and two buyers in the whole country then estate agents and mortgage brokers would no doubt jump up and down and point excitedly to the excess of buyers and predict a rise in prices as a result.
Nevertheless, there are still only two buyers and just one lucky seller. Can we really base the health of the nations housing stock on this?
Number of transactions make a nonsense of statistics
The numbers of transactions and the volume of new properties coming onto the market makes it almost impossible to draw any positive conclusions about house prices.
The number of new properties coming onto the market has fallen from a peak in February 2004 of over 7,400 per day to just 3,100 today whilst the number of homes actually selling over that period has fallen likewise from a peak 5,200 per day in the summer of 2007 when Northern Rock imploded to just 1,300 last Christmas, recovering slightly as one would expect at the end of the spring selling season to 2,500 a day today.
Using the values that are being paid today from so few transaction as a model for house prices across the country is crazy. To go further and make ill considered predictions that the market might be on the turn is irresponsible and the 674,000 people with their houses on the market today are going to be left asking if these estate agents think that the worst is over why hasn't their home been sold?







CommentsPlease login to leave a comment or report a post