Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within money.
The desperate seller is put on the spot. He must either accept the lower figure, or reject it and start the entire sales process all over again. Not a happy dilemma.
Donna Werbner, property expert at personal finance website fool.co.uk, confirms: "With house prices dropping, the practice of gazundering is coming back into fashion. People may think such a practice is unethical, or even immoral. But in a market where prices are falling rapidly, it's actually understandable."
In England and Wales, where there are no binding agreements on sale price until the contract stage, gazundering effectively disappears when house values are naturally rising. Then, it is replaced by gazumping, when a seller takes a late offer above the originally accepted figure.
But now prices are falling - and what's more, the introduction of some "no sale, no fee" conveyancing means buyers can progress a sale much further than before without spending a fortune. Then, if their gazundering offer is rejected, they can walk away pretty much unscathed. Werbner offers some tips on how to guard against such a scenario ...
Set a realistic.....continued below
Advertisement starts
Advertisement ends
asking price The less time it takes you to get an offer, the less desperate you will be to sell at any price.
If possible, opt for a chain-free buyer The quicker a buyer can move, the more valuable the offer.
Be upfront and honest about any defects If the buyer is aware of problems from the start, it is far more difficult for them to turn around later and use this as a reason to haggle down the price.
Get evidence State you want proof of the buyer's reasons for reducing the offer.
Be reasonable Maybe you could make a counter-offer? Remember, there are two sides to negotiating.
Weigh up the risk Consider the chances that the same thing might happen again with another buyer, and the costs you will lose on this current sale.
What matters most? Ask yourself what is most important: the sale or the money?
So is gazundering acceptable? The property establishment says no, unless it is linked to a problem with the home thrown up by the survey and valuation.
"Gazundering should be assessed on an individual basis," says Benson Beard of estate agency Bective Leslie Marsh.
"A buyer may have paid full price and, after a valuation, decided they are paying too much. The agent has to make a call: will we ever get that level again - and are there valid reasons for the reduced offer?
"But there are cowboys trying to buy from distressed sellers and thinking: 'If they will accept 10% less, then why not offer 20%?' This is when it's morally wrong."
Perhaps surprisingly, buying agents - property professionals hired by buyers to find and negotiate the lowest price on a house purchase - also oppose the tactic.
"In the current market, buyers should negotiate as hard as they can when the deal is set up, but when an offer is made and accepted, you're supposed to be as good as your word."
Of course, if buyers and sellers had the protection offered in some other countries, gazundering would be harder or even illegal, irrespective of price movements. In South Africa, a seller's agent issues a legally binding offer document, and the buyer pays a deposit which is non-refundable unless there are major problems shown in the survey. The seller cannot pull out without a fine either, sometimes twice the size of the deposit.
In Scotland, too, gazundering is much more difficult, although not impossible. Again, the offer document is effectively binding on both buyer and seller.
In theory, a seller in England or Wales can at least try to avoid gazundering by getting a lawyer to draw up a contract and seeking a buyer's non-refundable deposit of, say, 1% of the sale price.
But the obstacles are obvious. If problems are identified in a survey, if a buyer cannot dispose of their old home, or if the costs of the contract outweigh the loss in a gazundering offer, the whole process could unravel.
So, whether you view gazundering as unethical or fair game, it looks set to be part of house-selling for the foreseeable future, unless the transaction process is fundamentally changed to include more transparency and fair dealing. And after what many regard as the government's watering-down of consumer protection in the ill-fated Home Information Pack legislation, that is unlikely to happen any time soon.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2008