Skip to page content | Text onlyGraphical version of this page

Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within money.



Main Navigation


 Home  
  Products  
  My Tiscali  
  Living  
  Money  
  Motoring  
  News  
  Play to Win  
  Shop  
  Sport  
  Travel  
  Video  
  Help 

Insurers 'put pressure on claimants to settle for less'

Insurers 'put pressure on claimants to settle for less'



The conduct of insurers who deal directly with accident victims will be investigated following accusations that they put pressure on victims to waive their right to compensation or to settle claims for less than they should.

Trade unions and claimant lawyers have handed a dossier of evidence against such insurers to the Financial Services Authority (FSA) for investigation.

The trade union, Unite, has highlighted insurers who tried to settle the claims of injured people before they could take independent legal advice - known in the industry as 'third-party capture' - including one accident claim where insurance company Zurich offered £4,000 in 'full and final settlement', only for the case to be settled last November for £35,000.

The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers' (Apil) evidence includes a claim on behalf of bereaved parents who lost their three children in a road traffic accident. They were originally offered £21,000 by Quinn Direct over a claim that was settled last year for £60,000.

Both Unite and Apil say they are concerned about insurance company representatives cold-calling 'third-party' victims after an accident.

'The day after the accident, a lady knocked on my door and started asking me about it,' says Liz (not her real name), a 45-year-old garage receptionist from Stockport who, together with her 17-year-old son, suffered whiplash injuries when a learner driver drove into the back of her stationary.....continued below

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

car last May.

'The lady said she was from Quinn, asked me if I wanted a hire car and whether I planned to make a claim in the next six months. I signed the form,' she says. Liz claims not to have been aware that she had thus waived her legal right to compensation. She has subsequently been advised by her lawyer that the waiver was not effective.

Dublin-based Quinn Direct has since made Liz and her son offers of £1,400 each. A spokesman said: 'Quinn Direct operates a proactive approach to managing claims which involves getting in contact with potential claimants as soon as possible after an accident. Our experience is that people involved in an accident often feel insecure and are unsure what to do next, and they welcome our approach of speaking with them as soon as possible and sorting things out for them... We do not encroach on their right to seek legal advice, and make them aware of this.'

However, Liz's solicitor, Jason London, a partner at the Leeds law firm Morrish, says: 'A considerable amount of pressure was put on my client. Visiting an accident victim's house in the aftermath of a car crash is clearly outrageous.'

The FSA cannot decide whether there is a need to close what is perceived to be a regulatory gap. However, a spokesman says it is 'continuing to investigate the extent of the alleged customer detriment'. He says: 'To reach an informed conclusion, we shall have to gain a better understanding from insurance companies themselves of how they treat third-party claims and we are considering how best to go about this.'

Graham Goddard, Unite's deputy general secretary, says: 'We have given the FSA compelling evidence. There is a clear case for action to bridge a gap in the regulatory regime. Accident victims lose out because if they aren't receiving truly independent advice, they don't know the true value of the claims. Our evidence is that sometimes they are being told they don't have a good case when they do.'

The insurance industry acknowledges that 'third-party capture' is increasingly part of its business model as, insurers argue, a direct response to the increasing cost of processing claims. They argue that going directly to accident victims is a way of simply cutting out an expensive middle-man - the lawyer.

'No insurer wants to be accused of pressurising claimants into accepting compensation payments,' says Malcolm Tarling, a spokesman for the Association of British Insurers. 'Insurers want to identify those claims they believe are straightforward, where liability may not be in dispute and injuries are relatively minor. They want to settle these cases as quickly as possible.'

He claims that 'for every £1 paid in compensation, around 40p is paid in legal fees', a figure that can be as much as 70p in lower-value, more routine personal injury claims.

Royal & Sun Alliance is rebranding its claims handling RSA Care, with a view to increasing third-party capture. David Frost, its technical manager for motor claims, describes the legal process as 'horrendously elongated and massively costly'. He says: 'We were struggling to find the added value lawyers were bringing to typical low-value injuries,' and added that 'up to half' of third-party claimants are happy to resolve claims directly.

Norwich Union reckons that as many as 70 per cent of injury claims are straightforward enough not to need independent advice. A spokesman says claimants 'are always made aware that they are entitled to seek independent legal advice at any stage'.

Martin Bare, the president of Apil, argues that insurers are shirking their responsibilities. 'It is the job of insurers to pay compensation to those who are injured. To make sure the playing field is level, it's important that the claimant gets independent advice. That is the cost of the system.'

I felt intimidated

'It's a nightmare. I'm having sleepless nights,' says Nicky Ridha of the back pain she still suffers nearly three years after a car drove into the rear of her Renault Clio. The impact exacerbated an existing condition (scoliosis, or curvature of the spine) which had never seriously bothered her before. 'Now my back hurts when I do the most simple things - trying on clothes, shopping or reversing my car.'

Nicky was surprised to get a call the day after the crash from Elephant (part of the Admiral group), which insured the motorist who drove into her. She was offered £1,000 to settle the claim, but declined. Elephant rang back the next day, offering £1,700. 'I said I was waiting for medical advice, but they sent me the cheque, which I sent back.

'I felt intimidated, but was not prepared to take any offer until I knew what I was facing for my future.' She was referred to a consultant in August 2005 and is still having treatment.

She instructed her own solicitor, and in December 2007 received a cheque for £12,500 from Elephant.

A spokesman for Elephant said: 'All our case handlers are trained to explain every option available, and we ensure that we do not harass any third party as we are simply offering an alternative, not forcing them into anything.

'When we first speak to the third party, we ascertain as much information on the incident and the injury as possible so we are able to make a realistic offer. In Mrs Ridha's case our offers were based on the information we had at the time, which was that it was a whiplash injury, her GP had advised rest and she had not taken time off work.'

What you should do

·If you are injured in an accident, you should take independent legal advice.

·If you are a trade union member - or a family member is - you can receive this free through the union's legal service. If you are not, go to a specialist personal injury law firm. To find one, visit www.lawsociety.co.uk

·Don't trust insurers who knock on your door and want to talk about a claim, or ring or write to you and offer compensation.

·There are time limits (normally three years) for pursuing a personal injury claim, so don't rush into accepting any financial offer.

Source: Thompsons law firm

guardian.co.uk © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2008

Page: 123

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

a high street scene

Consumer news

Get the latest on consumer issues and trends - from property, rip-offs and pensions to fraud, political angles and rising prices

Features and analysis

Top quality stories and analysis of the burning money issues of the day - get the bigger picture
Share prices
Shares news
Keep bang up-to-date with the latest news affecting share prices and the stockmarket
Family

Free guides and brochures

There's a whole range of useful information to choose from including investing, retirement and family finances
Gas flame

Cut your household bills

Don't just moan about energy costs, do something about it! Switching providers is easy - many offer cash incentives and you could save hundreds of pounds

Page Footer


Access keys


You will need to use different key combinations in order to use access keys depending on your internet browser, find out which on our accessibility page.
  • (0) Navigate to Accessibility page.
  • (1) Navigate to Home page.
  • (2) Navigate to My email.
  • (3) Navigate to My Account.
  • (4) Navigate to Site Map page.
  • (5) Navigate to Contact us page.
  • (6) Navigate to Members channel.
  • (7) Navigate to Services channel.
  • (8) Navigate to News & Info channel.
  • (9) Navigate to Entertainment channel.
  • ([) Skip down to the Primary navigation block.
  • (]) Skip down to the more links within this section block.
  • (=) Bypass all navigation and jump to the content.
  • (x) Text only version of this page.
Background images used:
furniture images used in the site icons used in the site images used in the header