Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within money.
NatWest's legal department have decided there is a simple solution to the problem of the missing signatories. The bank would need nothing from the previous people if you called a meeting of the current governors, passed a resolution to change the names on the account and completed a new mandate. NatWest told me it had forwarded this information to you, but it said you were unhappy with the answer and did not respond. That sounded most odd. Your version of events shows how misunderstandings between banks and customers happen and, as in this case, you quickly reach stalemate again.
You had in fact welcomed the outcome. You were anxious to call a governors' meeting and you knew they would all agree to make the changes. But you needed to understand what a mandate was and exactly what wording the bank required. No one at the bank could explain this to you, nor provide a mandate form. You were then told the bank had no record of anyone.....continued below
Someone senior has now phoned you to explain what the governors need to sign and is sending you the forms. Once you have confirmed to the bank that the governors' meeting has taken place, NatWest will release the £25,000, which you want to spend on a playground.
Phoenix fails to rise from ashes of its correspondence
I recently received the annual bonus statement for an endowment policy with Phoenix Life. Alarmingly, the figures did not add up: the total plan benefit was some £7,000 less than it should be. I have written to Phoenix three times querying this, but have not had a response. DJY, Edinburgh
After I contacted Phoenix, you received six letters from the company in as many days. Phoenix agrees that you have grounds for complaint. Your original letter had been scanned in twice, which explains some of the duplication, but Phoenix confesses to sending you three letters that were irrelevant. It is sending you £30 to apologise. It also admits that it made mistakes on bonus statements this year - not just on yours - but has now corrected this.
I turned my ankle and went over on my overdraft
The original bill was for overdraft charges you incurred in April, but the money was not taken until May. Banks warn about fees in one month, but don't deduct them until the next. That is good because it gives you time to put money into your account to pay the fees. But returning your account to zero in the current month will not stop the charges. So, when these appear, they send you overdrawn again because there is no money to pay them and you incur more charges for the following month.
Lloyds TSB had in fact given you a temporary overdraft to cover the pre-notified charges that were about to hit your account, but you spent this money before the fees went through, so you went overdrawn again and more charges kicked in.
The bank has agreed to cancel this £165 bill. It has also, with your agreement, switched you from an account where you paid a monthly £7.95 fee to one without fees, which makes more sense. You are now just repaying overdraft charges and no extra fees.
Royal rides to belated rescue in neighbour row
I have a long-standing problem of harassment from my neighbour. Despite formal warnings from the police, she has kept on the right side of the law by regularly changing her behaviour. The situation is now so bad that I feel I have to apply for an injunction to prevent further problems. My household insurance with Royal & Sun Alliance includes legal expenses cover and I have asked them to clarify whether it covers this eventuality but, despite numerous phone calls, I have got nowhere. BS, Matlock
Royal admits that it has let you down. It now confirms that its legal expenses section covers £50,000 of the cost of taking your neighbour to court, but only for events that took place while you held the policy. Royal acknowledges that your dispute has continued for years and reached this crisis during the timescale of the policy. It has put First Assist, its legal services provider, in touch with you.
· Email Margaret Dibben at money.writes@observer.co.uk or write to Margaret Dibben, Money Writes, The Observer, 3-7 Herbal Hill, London EC1R 5EJ, and include a telephone number. Do not enclose SAEs or original documents. Letters are selected for publication and we cannot give personal replies. The newspaper accepts no legal responsibility for advice.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2008