Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within money.
In December, I decided to sell my Scottish Life policy to LSA Endowments. It offered me £8,549 against the £8,136 surrender value. It said this was a "firm offer" and as I could not deal with anyone else - you send the original policy document - I assumed I would get £8,549.
But then it withdrew the offer and substituted £8,090. Is this fair?GT, Monmouthshire
LSA Endowments, a traded endowment firm, justified the cut by referring you to the small print that LSA may, "at its absolute discretion withdraw its offer" if "bonus rates are changed." It argues it would otherwise have losses if rates go down - and in the currently unlikely event of bonuses rising, it would increase payments. It says this is a standard practice, but only happens very rarely.
Capital Letters argued the phrase "firm offer" referred to the amount offered and not just the fact there must be an offer at some price. And we pointed out the seller would now end up with less than the original £8,136 surrender value in December - the new Scottish Life value was £7,632.
LSA took these points on board - especially the second, referring to the loss you would have to accept. It will rewrite its contract to clarify what happens if bonus rates fall, while offering a better description of what a "firm offer" is. More importantly, it found the surrender value, when you agreed to.....continued below
All I wanted was my own tax haven ...
I tried to open the much-publicised Barclays Bank Tax Haven Isa account - after Guardian Money said it was a best buy. But when I went to my local branch, the bank staff said the account was only on offer for the coming tax year. This is advertised as "an Isa account with nothing to hide," so why was I turned down?LB, London
You were told this 6.5% Isa was only available for the tax year which starts tomorrow (Sunday). Why is unclear. There would be little point advertising an account which is not yet available.
After Capital Letters called, Barclays admitted it was wrong to send you away, although it did not explain why the mistake was made. It tried to contact you, but you are out of the country. Before you went, you opened a lower rate Isa - at Skipton building society - to ensure you used this tax year's allowance. Barclays says it does not accept transfers into its Tax Haven but will make an exception, promising a special "high level process" on your return. And it will offer you £50 compensation for your time and trouble.
So who's on the sucker list, now?
I was conned by a boiler room scam from Charles Fleming, based in Tokyo, losing $25,000 in a shares investment in a Vietnam leisure company.
Charles Fleming was closed down in Tokyo in 2006 for "operating a boiler room scam" following a complaint from the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). But that has not stopped Charles Fleming from staying in business and conning others. Its website proclaims it operates out of Shanghai and Seoul. As there are no addresses or phone numbers, it is unlikely to be found in either China or South Korea.
Clinton Parker is legally sited in the British Virgin Islands and there does not appear to be any Fleming connection. But that's not necessary. Company owners simply swap information on losers - they call it a "sucker list".
Money that simply went off the rails
In January I attempted to book four rail journeys for a trip to India, using the Indian Railways website. Credit card payments were taken, but immediately refunded due to a lack of seat availability. My statement shows the debits and credits were at different exchange rates, leaving me £1.65 out of pocket. Where has my money gone and who profited?KK, North Yorkshire
There are two ways of refunding foreign transactions. You can pay the 2.75% foreign currency usage fee twice - once for each direction. But more usually, as here, you get a credit of the money you spent so you avoid the fees because the deal did not take place.
Your loss is due to short-term changes in the sterling/Indian rupee exchange but it could have been a profit if it moved the other way. Indian Railways does not benefit as it gave back the same number of rupees as it took in the first place. Your £1.65 has ended up with speculators on the foreign currency market.
Update on ... Mansion House Securities
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Mansion House Securities £122,500 for giving customers unsuitable and inaccurate advice when selling higher-risk shares - including stocks on Aim, the lightly regulated stock market, and US shares which were difficult to sell.
The watchdog found its advisers failed to highlight the risks associated with the recommended shares and used inappropriate sales practices to pressure customers into buying. It did not ensure staff were properly trained. And it referred to "analysts" on its staff, when none were registered.
This is the third recent fine against a UK regulated broker for similar shortcomings. Mansion House would have faced a £175,000 fine had it not co-operated. It says it is committed to continuing to co-operate with regulators, and that this reflected an earlier phase of the firm's development.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2008