Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within money.
Financial PRs are the industry's highest paid, and for the most part are charming and manipulative, especially during a hostile takeover battle. Personal finance PR is at the rather more mundane end of the spectrum - but don't confuse dull for innocuous.
It's a huge industry, and incredibly successful at creating a consensus around products pushed on to millions of people.
In the 80s, virtually every bank, building society and insurance company issued press releases extolling the virtue of endowments. Soon enough, everyone thought you had to have one to get a mortgage. No one opposed it.
In the 90s it was personal pensions. This decade we've seen payment protection insurance pushed with vacuously repeated promises of "peace of mind" when all they want is a piece of your wallet. It's the same for buy-to-let. Hundreds, and possibly thousands, of press officers are paid to push these products. I know of no-one paid to oppose buy-to-let, despite the wreckage it is causing in the housing market.
This week the Independent National Housing and Planning Advice Unit revealed we're paying around £90 a month extra on our mortgages because of buy-to-let.....continued below
Yet the NHPAU felt compelled to add: "In any analysis of buy-to-let, it is important to consider the wider benefits." Why? Because hundreds of PRs say so, that's why. Substitute "endowments" for buy-to-let in that sentence. Now you're closer to the truth.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2008