Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within money.
But dig beneath the latest bonus announcements from these life assurers and the results look less impressive. The £34,183 payout on a 25-year endowment from Standard Life, based on an investment of £50 a month, is less than 40 per cent of the level reached in the glory years of the late Nineties; at Norwich Union, more than 90 per cent of its mortgage endowments are forecast to undershoot their target value.
To be fair, the peak payments were as over-inflated as the current ones are depressed. As Tom McPhail, pensions adviser at Hargreaves Lansdown, says, these with-profits funds are still suffering from the 'arms race in the late Nineties, when they indulged in reckless behaviour, spurred by the need to continue writing new business and the belief that the bull market would go on forever'. Nor were they the only ones seduced by stock market bull runs: some conventional fund managers, particularly in the technology sector, are still struggling to make up for their losses back then.
But with-profits funds have many more charges against.....continued below
Small wonder, then, that most of the big insurance companies have effectively stopped marketing with-profits. There are a few notable exceptions, including Prudential, one of the strongest performers around, which has worked hard to address the key drawbacks of with-profits, via products such as its PruFund. This product allows savers to track its value daily and only has surrender penalties in the early years. It has also performed well: anyone who invested £30,000 when it launched in November 2004 would have had a fund worth almost £40,000 three years later.
That performance has meant that the Pru is one of the few firms with a vibrant with-profits business: its PruFund has taken in £300m since launch and sales of its with-profits bond rose almost 60 per cent last year.
Standard Life has taken a different tack, embracing new-style products such as Sipps, the new flexible pension plans, which are generally cheaper and more transparent - an approach that owes much to Trevor Matthews, who has just resigned as head of its UK business to join Friends Provident, a departure that McPhail sees as bad news for the Scottish insurer.
Darius McDermott, managing director of Chelsea Financial Services, says: 'Multi-asset funds are a worthy - if not an improved - replacement for with-profits funds.' They have expanded the asset mix, 'finally delivering to retail investors real diversification across asset classes, previously only the preserve of institutional [or very wealthy] clients'. He cites Newton Phoenix, HSBC Global Return and Insight DTR as funds to consider.
Widows in the dog house
If you had put £100 into a building society account earning 5 per cent interest three years ago, you would now have almost £116. If you had put it into the three worst-performing UK funds in BestInvest's annual 'dog fund' survey, you could have lost as much as £12. CF CanLife's UK Smaller Companies fund has managed to turn £100 into £88 over that period, while the market as a whole has risen by 50 per cent; Marlborough UK Equity Growth and New Star Select Opportunities have done little better.
The survey's criterion for a 'dog fund' is one that has underperformed the market by 10 per cent over the last five years. By this measure the booby prizes go to Aberdeen and Schroders, which have 17.6 and 12.9 per cent of funds respectively in the doghouse. But BestInvest feels the worst offender of all is third-placed Scottish Widows: more than half its funds missed their benchmark over the last three years, albeit not all by as much as 10 per cent.
Most depressing, though, is that there is seldom any sign of a determination to improve. Fewer than half of the funds have changed managers over the period, despite their poor performance.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2008