I am a professional musician. I used to subscribe to The Strad, a magazine published by a firm called Orpheus. This cost £40.90 a year by direct debit.
Three years ago, I decided to cancel the subscription, while continuing with Opheus's Double Bassist.
I went to my local Nat West branch and watched the clerk expunge the direct debit from my record.
Since then, The Strad has stopped coming. But three direct debits were paid - one since refunded.
Finally, I went to the bank yet again to complain as I did not see why I should have laid out £40.90 on two occasions (£81.80) in this way. But all the bank could suggest was to contact trading standards.
Can you help?
PM
Hertfordshire
When the magazine publisher became part of a larger group, it moved to a bank system known as AUDDIS (Automated Direct Debit Instruction Service).
This automates the setting up of direct debit between the originator (the publisher) and your bank with special transaction codes.
But you started your debit with an older system which had your details.
It appears something failed in the changeover from legacy system to AUDDIS.
This is all technical - and none of it should have concerned you as you should have been protected by the Direct Debit Guarantee.
This says: "If an error is made by the organisation or your bank or building society, you are guaranteed a full and immediate refund from your branch of the amount paid. You can cancel a Direct Debit at any time by writing to your bank or building society."
The guarantee should have been activated - if only be cause NatWest ought to have been alerted by the number of times you complained. Telling you to go to trading standards was plain stupid. There is no suggestion of fraud - just a computer mess. So, trading standards has no interest.
NatWest now accepts you should have been helped earlier and more effectively. It regrets the wrong advice given and will now refund your £81.80 and send you £100 as a goodwill gesture.
Advance fee basis of scam
My bank says my account would be safe even if I sent details to a fraudulent "Spanish" lottery which is trying to persuade me there is a $615,810 prize for me. Is that so?
DB
Hertfordshire
You, and many others, have received a letter from the "Euromillones loteria international", a totally phoney set-up, based at the end of a Spanish mobile phone. Yours is signed by "Luis Miguel - Vice President." Other letter writers, presumably also hanging on the end of their mobiles, include Jose Miugel (sic) Perez and Juan Gomez.
All suggest sending bank details to Santa Lucia Security Company SA which, for a non-existent company, has a surprising number of addresses in Madrid and Rome.
But this is not a bank account looting exercise. The details requested are no different from those on your cheque.
So, your bank appears right. Instead, this is an "advance fee fraud" where you have to agree to pay Santa Lucia 10% of your winnings. The only difference between this "commission" and a normal fee to an agent is that the folks behind Santa Lucia want to take their "percentage" upfront and then disappear.
Can I claim holiday pay?
I have been off sick from my job since 1996 as a result of an industrial injury. I was paid up to January 1997.
Since, then I have not been paid anything due to my employer's permanent health insurance refusing my claim. I have had two operations to recover, and I have been living on savings.
I noticed a legal case where someone on sick leave could claim holiday pay that would have accrued if they had been at work. Does this apply to me?
AB
London
The case of Kigass Aero Components v Brown at an em ployment appeal tribunal in 2002 established the right to claim holiday pay in addition to sick pay - employers cannot say you have had your holiday while you are ill.
But your case is different. You were last on sick pay in early 1997 when any contractual relationship ceased.
You failed to challenge the permanent health decision at the time - it is almost certainly too late now.
Cost of using card abroad
You recently wrote that NatWest does not charge Switch debit users for foreign currency purchases. Why was I was charged £7.30 for taking out €200?
RD
London
The Capital Letter involved the common complaint from Visa debit users, charged a fee when they buy foreign currency in the UK. But most banks charge when you use a card in a foreign cash machine - irrespective of the label on the plastic. The exception is Nationwide.
Was I charged for texts?
Each time I drove over a frontier on the way to Germany, I received a Vodafone text on my Pay As You Go phone. I believe I was charged - Vodafone seems to agree, refunding £2.65 when I complained.
FM
Yorkshire
Vodafone says it never charges for receiving text messages. It cannot understand the garbled email you received. But the refund could have been a goodwill move. You were actually charged for receiving UK calls - "roaming" costs of 75p a minute.
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004
Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within money.