About seven million* homes and small businesses are vulnerable to Wi-Fi hijacking and so at risk of being wrongly disconnected from the Internet according to a new study into broadband security released today.


The study coincides with today’s launch of a campaign against Lord Mandelson’s plans to disconnect people suspected of illegal filesharing without a trial.


Don’t Disconnect Us (www.dontdisconnect.us) has been initiated by TalkTalk, Britain’s biggest provider of broadband to homes. The campaign’s website sets out three principal objections to Lord Mandelson’s plans;


1.  It by-passes the courts and gives rightsholders quasi-judicial powers


2. It exposes millions of people to false prosecution since it is based on an approach where those suspected of illegal filesharing will be presumed guilty and have to prove their innocence in order to avoid being falsely disconnected


3. It will do little to tackle illegal filesharing since the main offenders will easily avoid detection by using other people’s broadband connections to download content or encrypting their activity.  Indeed the proposed measures will increase Wi-Fi and PC hijacking and so increase even further the chances of innocent customers being wrongly cut off


The risk of innocent people being disconnected is not hypothetical. Consumer organisations such as Which? have been contacted by dozens of people who have been wrongly accused of filesharing by rightsholders who used a similar method to the one Lord Mandelson is suggesting.


Last week a knowledgeable Parliamentary committee, Apcomm, came out squarely against Mandelson’s disconnection plans saying “this approach [disconnection] to dealing with illegal file-sharing should not be further considered”


The Don’t Disconnect Us website provides a hub for people to learn the latest views on tackling illegal filesharing from around the world, a forum to discuss the issues and a link to a petition on the No 10 website where opposition to the plans can be registered.


The survey of 1,083 Wi-Fi connections, which was conducted by TalkTalk, found that 5 per cent of connections were completely open (ie no security at all), 36 per cent used WEP which is easily hackable and 56 per cent used WPA which is currently fairly secure, though a vulnerability has already been detected meaning it could become hackable soon. Only 3 per cent used the most secure form of protection, WPA2.

Find out more

A new YouGov poll commissioned by the Open Rights Group provides a response to Government proposals to force ISPs to disconnect suspected illegal downloaders.   Nearly 70% of those surveyed said someone suspected of illegal downloading should have a right to a trial in court before any restrictions on internet use were imposed.

Sion Simon, the minister for the internet, insists that disconnection is a last resort.   The growing backlash from internet users, camnpaign groups and now an all-party Parliamentary motion urging a rethink of the policy.   Barely 16% of respondents to the YouGov survey supported automatic curbs based on accusations by copyright holders such as musicians.

The core complains from ISPs is that the proposals require them to bear the costs of protecting a third party’s rights, namely the rights of the copyright holder.   In a context where illegal filesharers can avoid detection by encrypting traffic, or by hijacking someone else’s IP address or Wi-Fi network you can imagine the nighmare involved in policing the proposals.

In other results from the survey, 73% of respondents said they would find their ability to use vital commercial services, such as shopping and banking, completely disrupted or fairly harmed if they were disconnected.  

Last week’s inquiry into the issue of file sharing by the all-party Parliamentary communications group concluded:

“much of the problem with illegal sharing of copyrighted material has been caused by the rightsholders, and the music industry in particular, being far too slow in getting their act together and making popular legal alternatives available . . . . We do not believe that disconnecting end users is in the slightest bit consistent with policies that attempt to promote eGovernment, and we recommend that this approach to dealing with illegal filesharing should not be further considered.”

Ministers continue to stress that requiring Ofcom to demand ISPs take technical measures against people who repeatedly ignore the law, such as capping broadband speed or filesize, is a last resort.

• File Sharing: The Risks
• Music for life – get 50 free downloads

In a narrowly won vote, the French National Assembly passed a draft law that means that illegal downloaders will be disconnected from the internet.

The French policy on piracy has drawn global attention and seems to confirm the hard line stance taken by Lord Mandelson, here in the UK.

The French Socialist Party will appeal to the French Constitutional Court, the highest in France, in the hope that this draft law – like an earlier version – will be declared unconstitutional.

The proposed legislation operates under a three strikes system similar to that mooted by Lord Carter’s Digital Britain report. 

Consumer groups in France have warned that innocent people may get punished.    In addition, the European Parliament is currently considering whether depriving people of their internet access is a breach of human rights.

Spotify, the streaming music service, announced a music download service for £120 a year (in iTunes terms that’s a touch more than 150 tracks).   It is likely that you will need to be a Premium member to use the Spotify iPhone/iPod Touch native client which is on the cusp of release, pending Apple approval.

The iPhone version of Spotify eschews the streaming model.   Users acquire music as with any proprietary music download player.   Songs will be pulled from the Spotify desktop client encrypted cache and synced to a mobile player.   The music remains within the Spotify properietary system.  

As yet, there is no indication that you will be able to sideload an extracted MP3 file from Spotify Premium to another device.   So, it’s DRM of a sort.   In that regard the new Spotify model is comparable to Virgin’s upcoming ISP download service.

Spotify are clearly in search of a viable revenue stream, and this may be its best hope.   The current ad funded ‘free’ streaming model plays ads to users every three tracks or so and to date seems to net them about 15pence per user, per month; hardly enought to cover the cost of royalties.