Skip to page content |

Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within entertainment.

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

Content Starts Here


Shooting Dogs film review

SHOOTING DOGS
15certificate_15

SHOOTING DOGS


Running time: 115 mins
Starring: John Hurt, Hugh Dancy
Tiscali Rating of 08Tiscali Rating of 08

Scottish director Michael Caton-Jones has two films released on the same day in 2006: Basic Instinct 2 and Shooting Dogs. It would be hard to think of two more different subject matters, but the versatility Caton-Jones has shown in directing both is already made apparent from his CV which includes films as diverse as Rob Roy and The Jackal.

Inevitable comparisons will be made between Shooting Dogs and Hotel Rwanda, last year's Rwanda film which covers very similar ground: namely the atrocities that occurred there in 1994 and how a diehard group of Samaritans attempted to save some of the population from certain death. Hotel Rwanda was an impressive work, and Shooting Dogs is at least its equal, if not better. It will probably remain in the shadow of the American film simply because of the fact that it has been released later, but on its own terms Shooting Dogs is arguably a more powerful affair.

John Hurt plays Christopher, a Catholic priest in charge of a school in central Rwanda. Hugh Dancy is Joe, a young idealistic teaching assistant at the school, popular with his colleagues and pupils. When the president of the country is killed, civil war breaks out between the Hutu and Tutsi tribes, with the Hutus slaughtering their enemies in vast numbers: deaths largely inflicted by machete.

Christopher opens the school gates to Tutsi refugees and soon there are thousands in the compound, with a baying pack of armed Hutu militia waiting for them to step outside. The school's only protection comes from a beleaguered UN force, unable to take action themselves and forced to follow orders which mean they can only protect the European refugees. When the soldiers are told to pull out of the school, there seems very little option for those inside.

What's particularly impressive about Shooting Dogs is the manner in which each character's moral dilemma is put across: from Hurt's overly devout priest who begins to question his faith, to Dancy's naïve youth desperate to save the friends he has made from inevitable death. Similarly, a weary war reporter faces a new challenge, and the UN commander is stuck following distant orders which make little sense.

The film is co-produced by the BBC and it is exactly the type of project the Corporation should be delivering. Those involved - not least journalist David Belton who co-wrote and produced the feature after witnessing the events first hand - should be extremely proud of their achievement. Particularly impressive is the way in which the film fails to opt out and give a magic ending: instead it is worth waiting for the credits for the full emotional impact to take effect. One million people were slaughtered in the space of a few months in history's most recent genocide, and there is plenty of room for two intelligent and passionate films on the subject.

Paul Hurley


page: 1 | 2
Search Our Reviews
Type the title of the film you want to find a review for in the box below and click on 'Search'
 
 
Click on the relevant letter to browse the film reviews in our database whose titles begins with that letter:

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z NUMBERS

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends


John Hurt

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

Advertisement starts



Advertisement ends

Page Footer