Tiscali Quicklinks. Please visit our Accessibility Page for a list of the Access Keys you can use to find your way around the site, skip directly to the main navigation, to the page content, or to more links within business.
With absence management topping the HR professionals’ priority list in the last 12 months, it is not surprising that almost all employers - more than nine in 10 (90%) take an active interest in managing their employees’ attendance at work, according to research published by IRS Employment Review.
The same techniques for managing absence are rated as most effective across employers of all kinds and sizes. These combine positive assistance and more hands-on management control of attendance. The IRS HR Prospects Survey 2004 finds that the four most popular methods are: return-to-work interviews (82%), improved record-keeping (67%), taking targeted action (62%) and offering rehabilitation (57.2%).
This research, conducted in early 2004, is based on a survey of 519 HR departments. The questionnaire was followed up by a focus group and one-to-one interviews. The results are available in IRS Employment Review. The survey is now in its third year; more than 100 of the organisations that took part in this year’s research also participated in 2003.
Key findings
Staff absences (past 12 months)
Expected changes in absence (next 12 months)
IRS Employment Review Absence and Attendance editor Neil Rankin said:
“There are important reasons why HR specialists are more optimistic about absence management. First, some organisations believe that they have introduced or improved as many attendance-management measures as are cost-effective to do so. These organisations consider that the issue will not go away, but cannot remain a top HR priority forever. HR managers also believe that as they have given priority to absence management, the results are about to be seen.
“However, with this optimism, comes a word of caution. While employers generally expect their experience of absence to get better, they are less optimistic about stress-related absences.
“And in relation to workplace bullying, while there is an optimism that this problem will reduce in the coming year, far more employers - a quarter of all those we contacted - were unable to provide an answer about bullying’s incidence than were uncertain about any of the other four issues. We have to wonder whether bullying is adequately monitored by organisations’ systems.”